The history of British protest: from Peterloo to punk
On the 16th of August 1819, somewhere between 60,000 and 80,000 people gathered peacefully at St Peter’s Field in Manchester to demand parliamentary reform. They brought their families. Some wore their Sunday best. The local magistrates, watching from a nearby house, decided this constituted a threat to public order. Within minutes, cavalry had charged into the crowd with sabres drawn. Fifteen people died. Over 600 were injured. The government congratulated the troops.
The men who built the atomic bomb tried to warn the world. This drawn history shows what happened to them and why the people building AI are saying the same things now.
▶ Follow Very Brexit Problems on YouTube
The press named it Peterloo — a savage joke at the expense of Waterloo, fought just four years earlier. The name stuck. So, it turned out, did the anger.
A very British tradition
Britain has a peculiar relationship with protest. On one hand, it has a long tradition of civic dissent, petitioning, marching, and making itself heard. On the other, it has an equally long tradition of the establishment finding creative ways to ignore, suppress, or simply wait out whoever is doing the shouting. The result, across two centuries, is a history that alternates between genuine progress and spectacular institutional stubbornness — occasionally in the same decade.
The Peterloo Massacre did not, in the short term, produce reform. It produced the Six Acts — a package of repressive legislation designed to make large public meetings illegal. But it also produced a mood. Percy Bysshe Shelley, who wrote The Masque of Anarchy in direct response, captured it: Rise like Lions after slumber / In unvanquishable number. The poem wasn’t published for another eleven years, which perhaps says something about the era.
The Chartists and the long game
By the late 1830s, the working class had found a new vehicle: Chartism. The movement’s demands — a vote for every man, secret ballots, equal constituencies — look fairly modest by modern standards. At the time they were considered revolutionary. Between 1838 and 1848, the Chartists presented three vast petitions to Parliament. The first carried over a million signatures. The second, in 1842, carried over three million — roughly a third of the adult population. Parliament rejected them all.
Chartism fizzled out after 1848 without winning a single one of its six demands. Most of them became law within the following fifty years. This is, it turns out, fairly standard for British protest: you lose, loudly, and then history quietly proves you right.
Deeds, not words
The suffragettes arrived with a different strategy. Emmeline Pankhurst’s Women’s Social and Political Union, founded in 1903, had no patience for the long game. Their motto — Deeds Not Words — was not a slogan so much as a programme. Window-smashing, arson, hunger strikes, chaining themselves to railings: the WSPU understood that polite petitioning had already been tried, at length, by their predecessors in the suffragist movement, and that Parliament had not especially noticed.
The tactics were controversial — they remain controversial — but the underlying calculation was correct. Peaceful campaigning alone had achieved nothing in forty years. Between 1912 and 1914, the suffragettes escalated to a point where the government could no longer ignore them, even while trying very hard to do exactly that. Women over thirty got the vote in 1918. Women on equal terms with men had to wait until 1928. The statue of Emmeline Pankhurst stands today in Victoria Tower Gardens, a short walk from Parliament.
Nine days in May
The General Strike of 1926 lasted nine days. Around 1.7 million workers walked out in support of the miners, who had been told to accept a pay cut and longer hours. The government mobilised the army, used the BBC as a propaganda tool, and printed its own newspaper, the British Gazette, edited personally by Winston Churchill. The TUC called the whole thing off after nine days and the miners stayed out alone for another six months before hunger forced them back on worse terms than they’d been offered at the start.
It reads, on paper, like a comprehensive defeat. In practice, it was the moment British organised labour demonstrated that it could shut down the country — a fact that governments have been quietly mindful of ever since.
Marching against the bomb
By 1958, a different kind of fear had taken hold. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament launched that year with a march from London to the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston, Berkshire — a 52-mile walk that attracted tens of thousands by the early 1960s. The images are strikingly cheerful: families, folk singers, people in duffel coats. The stakes, of course, were slightly higher than usual: they were marching against the end of the world.
CND didn’t get what it wanted. Britain kept its nuclear weapons. But it established something important: that moral protest — protest organised around conscience rather than direct material interest — could mobilise a mass movement. That template would be used again, and again, in the decades that followed.
Punk, Poll Tax, and the persistence of noise
In 1976, protest took a different form entirely. Punk was not, strictly speaking, a political movement — the Sex Pistols would have been the first to tell you they weren’t campaigning for anything in particular. But it arrived in a Britain of unemployment, industrial decline, and mounting class frustration, and it sounded like all of those things simultaneously. The Clash were more explicitly political; their 1977 debut album reads, in retrospect, like a manifesto delivered at high volume. Protest doesn’t always carry a placard.
The Poll Tax riots of 1990 were more straightforwardly old-fashioned. Margaret Thatcher’s Community Charge — a flat-rate local tax that took no account of income — managed the impressive feat of uniting almost every section of British society against it. The riot in Trafalgar Square on 31st March 1990 involved an estimated 200,000 people. By November, Thatcher had resigned. The Poll Tax was scrapped the following year.
It remains the clearest modern example of protest achieving its precise stated aim within a short timeframe. Most British protest history ends less tidily. But the tradition is long enough, and the memory stubborn enough, that each generation seems to rediscover it — usually just when it’s needed.
The placards change; the impulse doesn’t. If you’d like to carry it around, VeryBrexitProblems keeps a Resist collection in much the same spirit.
More from the protest and revolution archive: 5 passionate protests that really did change the world · Sign of the times! 14 protest signs that sum up the Sixties · Britain’s Greatest Political Eccentrics Throughout History · Picture power: 10 films that shook the world
